
Running live Q&A during webinars and virtual events is rarely simple. As audience size grows, questions pile up, important points get missed, and engagement drops. Choosing the best platforms for hosting live Q&A helps webinar hosts, SaaS teams, educators, and internal communicators keep questions organized and conversations focused.
The right live Q&A platform makes it easier to manage audience questions, moderate discussions, and involve more participants in real time. This guide compares live Q&A platforms, explains which features matter most, and shows how teams can run clearer and more accessible live Q&A sessions, especially for global audiences.
| Live Q&A Platform | Core Q&A Features | Typical Q&A Limitation | How JotMe Improves the Q&A Workflow | Best Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slido | Anonymous questions, upvoting, moderation, Teams & Zoom integrations | No built-in live translation or transcription | Adds real-time multilingual transcription and translation in 107 languages, so global audiences understand questions and answers instantly | Internal town halls and company-wide Q&A |
| Pigeonhole Live | Moderated Q&A, upvoting, polls, enterprise-grade reporting | Translation is limited to higher-tier plans and text-focused | Provides contextual live voice translation, AI summaries, and readable Q&A transcripts for broader accessibility | Global conferences and multilingual events |
| Vevox | Anonymous Q&A, quizzes, polls, learning analytics | Focused on participation, not post-Q&A clarity | Creates searchable AI notes and translated Q&A summaries for review after sessions | Training sessions and education |
| Mentimeter | Live word clouds, audience input visualization, engagement metrics | Q&A answers can be missed in fast-paced sessions | Captures spoken Q&A with real-time transcription and translation for clarity | Keynotes and large presentations |
| AhaSlides | Slide-based Q&A, quizzes, interactive presentations | Limited accessibility support for diverse audiences | Improves understanding with live Q&A transcription and multilingual summaries | Webinars and interactive workshops |
| Wooclap | Message wall, upvoting, multiple question types | A high volume of questions can overwhelm participants | Organizes Q&A with AI-generated summaries and translated notes | Classrooms and hybrid learning |
| Zoom Webinars | Built-in Q&A, upvoting, anonymity, post-event reports | No native live multilingual translation | Adds live Q&A translation and transcription without changing the Zoom workflow | Product demos and marketing webinars |
Slido, Pigeonhole Live, Vevox, Mentimeter, AhaSlides, Wooclap, and Zoom Webinars are among the most widely used live Q&A platform options for webinars and virtual events. Each live Q&A platform offers a different balance of real-time question handling, moderation, and integrations, helping hosts manage audience questions effectively. The tools below cover a range of use cases, from internal meetings to global conferences.

In many all-hands meetings, leaders invite questions, but participation stays low. Employees hesitate to speak up publicly or worry that their questions aren’t important. Slido solves this by allowing people to submit questions anonymously before or during the session, then vote on the ones they care about most. Instead of addressing whoever speaks first, leaders can focus on the questions that matter to the majority. This creates a more democratic, transparent Q&A experience, especially in large or remote organizations.
Strengths
Limitations

Running a global town hall often means some employees struggle to follow questions asked in another language. Important points get lost, and participation drops. Pigeonhole Live is designed for this challenge, offering real-time AI translation for questions and answers across dozens of languages. Employees can ask and read questions in their preferred language while staying part of the same conversation. For international conferences or global company meetings, this keeps Q&A inclusive, accurate, and aligned across regions.
Strengths
Limitations

In classrooms and training sessions, many participants stay silent not because they understand everything, but because they fear asking the wrong question. Vevox changes this by making anonymous participation central to the experience. Learners can submit questions, respond to polls, and join quizzes without being identified. This encourages honest engagement and reveals real knowledge gaps. For educators and trainers, Vevox creates a psychologically safe environment where participation reflects understanding rather than confidence.
Strengths
Limitations

Traditional Q&A breaks down when hundreds of people are watching a presentation. Mentimeter approaches this differently by turning audience input into live visuals like word clouds and charts. Instead of hearing a few individual questions, presenters see collective patterns and concerns in real time. This works especially well for conferences, executive briefings, and keynote sessions where clarity and speed matter. The result is a shared understanding of audience sentiment, not just a list of questions.
Strengths
Limitations

Managing slides, polls, and Q&A across multiple tools often disrupts the flow of a presentation. AhaSlides simplifies this by combining everything into one interactive platform. Presenters build slides with built-in Q&A, quizzes, and polls, all controlled from a single interface. Participants join using their phones, while results appear instantly on the slides. This makes AhaSlides especially useful for trainers, marketers, and consultants who run frequent webinars and want fast setup without sacrificing engagement.
Strengths
Limitations

In large lectures or workshops, it’s hard to tell who’s confused and who’s following along. Wooclap addresses this by offering many ways for participants to engage, such as posting questions, upvoting others, ranking answers, or signaling confusion anonymously. Instead of relying on verbal questions, instructors get real-time feedback from the entire group. This allows them to adjust the session as it happens, making Wooclap particularly effective for education and training environments where understanding matters more than presentation flow.
Strengths
Limitations

For teams already running webinars on Zoom, the built-in Q&A often removes the need for an additional platform. Participants submit and upvote questions directly inside the webinar interface, without new logins or tools. While the feature set is simpler than that of dedicated Q&A platforms, it covers core needs such as moderation, anonymity, and post-event reporting. Zoom’s strength lies in convenience. Q&A works seamlessly within an environment most audiences already know.
Strengths
Limitations
The most effective live Q&A platforms combine real-time question submission, strong moderation, audience prioritization, and seamless integrations to help teams manage audience questions during webinars without losing focus or engagement. These live Q&A moderation features directly impact how clearly questions are handled and how inclusive the session feels.


JotMe does not replace your live Q&A platform; it strengthens it by improving how audiences understand questions and answers in real time. As one of the practical tools to make webinars more interactive, JotMe adds live Q&A translation on top of existing webinar and Q&A tools, helping teams run clearer and more inclusive sessions.
Instead of switching tabs or searching online, attendees can stay focused on the conversation while getting the information they need. For hosts and presenters, this reduces repeated questions and keeps the live Q&A flowing smoothly, even as audience engagement increases.

By working alongside your existing webinar and live Q&A platforms, JotMe improves understanding, accessibility, and engagement, without changing how you already host live Q&A sessions.
Knowing how to host a live Q&A is essential for keeping webinars and virtual events engaging and well-structured. When teams understand how to run live Q&A in webinars with clear processes, they can avoid chaos, surface relevant questions, and create a better experience for both speakers and audiences. The steps below reflect best practices for live Q&A sessions.

Running live Q&A translation online is essential when events involve global or multilingual audiences. Without translation support, valuable questions and answers can be misunderstood or ignored, reducing engagement and impact. Multilingual Q&A translation ensures that all participants can follow, participate, and benefit equally from live discussions, regardless of language or location.
Here, live Q&A translation apps like JotMe offer contextual live translation, AI chat, quick memos, and AI notes for late access and real-time understanding. With 100+ languages supported, JotMe helps global teams run more inclusive and effective live Q&A sessions without changing their existing platforms.
Selecting the right live Q&A platform helps webinar hosts, educators, HR teams, and global teams keep discussions organized, interactive, and easy to follow. Adding live Q&A translation apps like JotMe enhances these sessions by providing multilingual transcription, live Q&A translation, and searchable summaries, so participants can understand questions and answers in real time.
JotMe allows hosts to share translation minutes, allowing attendees to access live translations even after the session. Combining these features ensures every participant stays engaged, informed, and able to contribute during real-time Q&A with the audience, regardless of language or location.
The best platform for hosting live Q&A depends on your event goals and audience. Tools like Slido work well for internal meetings and town halls, while Mentimeter is well-suited for large conferences. Pigeonhole Live supports multilingual audiences, and Zoom Webinars is convenient for existing Zoom users. The right choice depends on scale, moderation needs, and accessibility features.
Yes, live Q&A sessions can effectively support multilingual audiences when paired with translation tools. Platforms like Pigeonhole Live offer built-in translation, while tools like JotMe provide live Q&A translation online through real-time multilingual transcription. This allows participants to follow questions and answers in their preferred language without disrupting the session.
Most live Q&A platforms include moderation features that let hosts review, approve, or filter questions before they appear to the audience. Moderators can merge duplicates, remove irrelevant questions, and prioritize topics using upvotes. These controls help manage audience questions in webinars while keeping discussions focused and respectful.
You can make live Q&A more accessible by removing language, confidence, and comprehension barriers for participants. Features such as anonymous question submission help hesitant attendees participate, while live Q&A transcription supports hearing-impaired users and late joiners. Real-time translation and searchable summaries ensure everyone can follow the discussion, and tools like JotMe let hosts share translation minutes so all attendees can access them easily.
Many live Q&A platforms provide basic post-event reports, but deeper insights come from transcription and summaries. By using JotMe alongside your Q&A platform, hosts can generate searchable summaries, multilingual transcripts, and translated notes. This makes it easier to review discussions, share outcomes, and reuse Q&A content after the event.

Win Globally